THE INVESTOR
|
19
H
olidays abroad this year
were even more
damaging than normal
to our bank accounts.
The Brexit vote in June
caused an immediate and sharp fall in the
value of the pound on foreign exchanges.
This is because traders expected the UK
to be weaker, and its future to be
uncertain, if it left the world’s leading
trading block, so they switched to
currencies with a more stable outlook.
Unfortunately for those heading for the
beaches abroad, the immediate impact
of sterling’s overnight depreciation was
a significant increase in costs abroad.
What was different about the
aftermath of the Brexit vote was that the
pound moved significantly in a short space
of time.This is unusual; normally it drifts
up and down over months and years,
changing so slowly that for most people
the price impact is lost amidst a sea of
other changes and price rises.
The impact of a sharp and sudden drop
in the value of our currency spreads far
beyond the holiday pound; devaluations
can transform the prospects of a nation.
Currency depreciation should make our
exports more competitive simply because
it makes our products cheaper in foreign
currency terms and therefore easier to sell.
Simultaneously, it encourages people to
buy British rather than foreign-produced
goods, which become more expensive in
sterling terms – or holiday at home rather
than on the Costa del Sol.
The downside is that items that can’t be
produced at home – French wine,German
cars and the rawmaterials from the likes of
China that manufacturing needs – cost
more.These higher import costs normally
fuel inflation, which, in turn, pushes up
exporters’ costs and eventually their prices,
cancelling out the effect of any price cut
from devaluation. But that cycle normally
takes a few years to work through and in
the meantime countries get a boost,which
is why politicians often stealthily encourage
currency depreciation – they see it as a
quick fix for long-term problems.
Balance sheet
Devaluation may be an option on the
table but would present risks for the UK economy. Seek
professional advice before making any investment.
In practice, however, the impact can
be less straightforward than it appears in
economic models. For one thing,
devaluation only works if other countries
allow it to.Alternatively, they can negate
its effects by devaluing too.This can lead
nations down a dangerous path.A series
of competitive devaluations in the 1930s
and the consequent destruction of trade
relations soured relationships between
countries and added considerably to the
problems of the time. In the current era,
efforts to manipulate the value of currency
are the source of considerable tension
between the US and China, China and
Japan, and indeed the EU and the UK. US
presidential candidate Donald Trump’s
rhetoric against trade agreements is fuelled
by the feeling that the system is being
unfairly manipulated.
Only Switzerland attracts sympathy.
Investors have poured money into the
safe-haven country, pushing the Swiss franc
so high it is a serious problem for the
country’s exporters – despite them being
among the world’s most efficient
companies.The government has tried to
weaken its exchange rate, including
removing its peg to the euro, but this has
been largely unsuccessful.
Theworld ismore complex in otherways.
In the 1990s, Britain’s exports soared
following the devaluation precipitated by
our forced exit from the European
Exchange Rate Mechanism. But when the
pound fell similarly sharply after the 2008
financial crisis, history did not repeat itself.
Exports continued to stagnate.
One factor was that the eurozone
was in trouble, so people there were not
buying our goods – or anyone else’s –
irrespective of how much cheaper they
had become. But it also matters what
you are trying to sell. Britain’s exports
in the 1990s were mainly manufactured
goods, where price gives you an edge.
In more modern economies with
high-end products – such as
pharmaceuticals, computer software
or jet engines and most of all with the
export of services – people will pay
what they have to pay because price
matters much less than quality and
performance.Asa rule of thumb, the
more sophisticated the economy, the
less likely it is that devaluation
significantly boosts export volumes.
Lastly, there is the financial impact,
which manifests itself in two ways.One
is that British companies become more
attractive takeover targets because they
have become significantly cheaper to
a foreign buyer.
The other issue is the vexed question
of the budget deficit and the continuing
need for the government to finance
itself through borrowing.A considerable
slice of the monthly gilt auction is
targeted at overseas investors, but they
won’t lend if they think they will be
repaid in devalued pounds – or they
will demand a higher interest rate to
compensate for the risk.
Similarly, there is an added risk from
overseas investors holding UK shares as
the value of dividends is reduced, making
them less appealing. Small depreciations
may be tolerated, but it is a very fine line
and we would be in deep trouble if they
ever thought the UK was deliberately
devaluing. Most countries borrow far less
from abroad than we do, so they can
afford to flirt with devaluation. For the
UK, with its huge budget deficit, the risks
are a lot greater – which is what lay
behind Bank of England Governor Mark
Carney’s warning a few months back that
we depend on‘the kindness of strangers’.
Most countries borrow
far less thanwe do, so
they can afford to flirt
with devaluation
Getty Images
CURRENCY
ANALYSIS




